Quantcast
Channel:
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9612

Let's Chart Some Threes Because We're Nervous

$
0
0

39069895180_51a3a83403_z

[JD Scott]

Michigan's offense during the opening weekend of the tourney was… not great. Michigan failed to hit a point per possession in either game. A sloppy, weird, late-night game against Montana with 14 turnovers rather explains itself. The Houston game not so much.

While Houston does sport one of the country's better defenses, Michigan turned the ball over just seven times. They shot 45% from two, nine points under their season average; they were a grim 24% from three before Jordan Poole's miracle pulled them up to 27%. If they'd hit their not-very-impressive season average of 36%, the end of that game is Michigan putting the clamps on whilst up 6-8 points.

Game-to-game shooting variance is of course the very heart of basketball but I wanted to see if Houston had done anything that warranted that kind of performance or if it was just one of those things. So I started poking around and got quite deep in the weeds, because quantifying what's a good three pointer and what's a bad one is tricky. But I'm willing to give it a shot after checking out this paper from the 2014 Sloan Conference. It uses NBA data to create a model of what a good shot is; that model is way beyond the scope of this post but there were a couple of graphs that confirm everyone's eye test.

The first: catch and shoot is better than off the dribble.

image

Second, and possibly counterintuitively, every foot matters when you're closing out.

image

As the paper authors put it it, "it is not simply a matter of a shot being “contested” or not but ... there is significant marginal value in every foot of space between the shooter and the closest defender." I wouldn't necessarily have expected that. (Also, I assume that the big uptick in long jumper eFG when a guy is in your grill is because he's fouling you.)

These are NBA numbers but there's no reason to expect that college basketball players would deviate from either of these assertions. So, here's a bunch of three pointers charted. Spoiler alert: the large majority of the attempts Michigan got off were good looks with reasonable space between the shooter and the defender. A fairly typical look:

image

image

Y/NLengthShooterStateDefender distanceContestNotes
MISS22Mathewscatch and shoot3lightLate clock jack is surprisingly clean look
MISS23MAARcatch and shoot2heavyCurl screen gets vg closeout from Houston defender
MISS24Simpsoncatch and shoot6nonePNR switch w big sagging off Simpson, no contest
MISS22Liverscatch and shoot3moderatedrive and kick rhythm three from wing
MISS22MAARoff the dribble4lightswitch confusion for UH gives MAAR opportunity to gather and go straight up
MAKE28Robinsoncatch and shoot3heavylate clock deep jack is worst look of game so far, goes down
MAKE24Robinsoncatch and shoot7lightV-cut and Teske screen gets Robinson clean look
MISS22Wagnercatch and shoot3moderatepick and pop open-ish, decent contest
MAKE22Robinsoncatch and shoot2moderateRobinson's defender is lax for a second and DR just rises over him
MAKE22Poolecatch and shoot4lightpenetrate and kick to Wagner, extra pass, open corner
MISS22Simpsoncatch and shoot8nonedrive and kick, Poole upfakes and dribbles once to draw a second guy, Simpson wide open in corner
MISS22Pooleoff the dribble2heavybad heat check stepback w/ 21 seconds on clock
MISS24Poolecatch and shoot4lightdrive and kick from MAAR
MISS27Robinsonoff the dribble2heavylate clock, initial contest and one-dribble lanch
MISS24MAARcatch and shoot8nonenumbers for M, shot fake from MAAR gets wide open look, airball
MISS22MAARoff the dribble2heavylast ditch attempt at end of half
HALFTIME      
MISS22Matthewscatch and shoot4lightWagner kick to Simpson over for open look
MAKE23Wagnercatch and shoot5lightSimpson pick and pop
MISS23Wagnercatch and shoot5lightNear identical pick and pop from same spot on the floor
MISS23Simpsoncatch and shoot4lightPoole drive and kick, token contest
MAKE23Wagnercatch and shoot5moderatePick and pop from left wing, and one
MISS24Robinsoncatch and shoot6nonewing pick from Matthews opens this up. No contest... airball.
MISS25MAARoff the dribble4moderatePNR switch, pretty good contest from the big MAAR rises up on
MISS23Robinsoncatch and shoot6lightSimpson drives baseline and kicks to left wing
MISS22Robinsoncatch and shoot5lightOREB to scramble drill to corner 3
MAKE22Matthewscatch and shoot4moderateSimpson drive and kick; lucky bounce off heel and straight up and down
MISS25Matthewsoff the dribble2heavylate clock jack is not at all a clean look
MAKE30Poolecatch and shoot2heavyTHIS IS A BAD LOOK BUT OKAY

Leaving out the two must-launches at the end of each half and Michigan had just 5 off the dribble looks on 28 attempts, two of those from MAAR in pretty good situations. One was a pick and roll switch with the big playing off, the other an opening when Houston got confused on another pick and roll.

Houston did force five heavily contested late-clock jacks, one of which went down when Robinson hit a deep one. There was also one more heavily contested three as Corey Davis came around a screen really well on an early MAAR attempt. The other 20 attempts I charted were all reasonable to excellent looks that simply didn't go down. Eight attempts from Michigan's worst three-point shooters, Simpson and Matthews, isn't a particularly unusual ratio. Those guys have about 20% of Michigan's attempts on the year. 8 of 28 non-desperation threes is a couple more than you'd expect, but not outlandish.

Verdict: just one of those things. One that happens to a team like Michigan that's not exactly Villanova.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 9612

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>